Thursday, November 24, 2011

Reify


Reification (also known as concretism, or the fallacy of misplaced concreteness) is a fallacy of ambiguity, when anabstraction (abstract belief or hypothetical construct) is treated as if it were a concrete, real event, or physical entity. In other words, it is the error of treating as a "real thing" something which is not a real thing, but merely an idea. For example: if the phrase "fighting for justice" is taken literally, justice would be reified.
Another common manifestation is the confusion of a model with reality. Mathematical or simulation models may help understand a system or situation but real life always differs from the model.
Note that reification is generally accepted in literature and other forms of discourse where reified abstractions are understood to be intended metaphorically, but the use of reification in logical arguments is usually regarded as a fallacy.

Reification often takes place when natural or social processes are misunderstood and/or simplified; for example when human creations are described as “facts of nature, results of cosmic laws, or manifestations of divine will”. Reification can also occur when a word with a normal usage is given an invalid usage, with mental constructs or concepts referred to as live beings. When human-like qualities are attributed as well, it is a special case of reification, known as pathetic fallacy (or anthropomorphic fallacy).
Nature provides empathy that we may have insight into the mind of others.
Reification may derive from an inborn tendency to simplify experience by assuming constancy as much as possible.

In the philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead, one commits the fallacy of misplaced concreteness when one mistakes an abstract beliefopinion or concept about the way things are for a physical or "concrete" reality.
There is an error; but it is merely the accidental error of mistaking the abstract for the concrete. It is an example of what I will call the ‘Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness.’[4]
Whitehead proposed the fallacy in a discussion of the relation of spatial and temporal location of objects. Whitehead rejects the notion that a concrete physical object in the universe can be ascribed a simple spatial or temporal extension, that is, without reference of its relations to other spatial or temporal extensions.

re·i·fy (r-f, r-)
tr.v. re·i·fiedre·i·fy·ingre·i·fies
To regard or treat (an abstraction) as if it had concrete or material existence.
reify [ˈriːɪˌfaɪ]
vb -fies-fying-fied
(tr) to consider or make (an abstract idea or concept) real or concrete

Noun1.reification - regarding something abstract as a material thing
objectification - the act of representing an abstraction as a physical thing
2.reification - representing a human being as a physical thing deprived of personal qualities or individuality

No comments:

Post a Comment